Flying
Beware Airfare Pundits Bearing Statistics
By George Hobica, Airfarewatchdog.com
posted: 25 March 2009 02:32 pm ET
Mark Twain famously wrote that "There are three kinds of lies: lies,
damned lies, and statistics." Some of our best friends are
statisticians, and Airfarewatchdog.com
is not against statistics. But we don't quite understand the math used
by many of our colleagues in the airfare punditry business when it
comes to reporting on the ups and downs of airfares.
We've seen the same media mentions you have: X number of airfare
increases, X number of decreases; fares went down 50%; fares went up
$10; the fare on such and such a route is down $50 from last month or
last year.
But what do these figures really mean? For example, if Continental's
lowest published fare from Houston to Los Angeles goes down from $298
round-trip to $208 round-trip, does that mean that the average fare
sold by Continental and all of its travel agency partners on that route
decreased by $90? Not necessarily. If Continental only offers and sells
one seat at the newly lowered fare, but every other fare they sell goes
for $398 round-trip, then the average fare sold
is much higher. True, the lowest published fare went "down" but that
doesn't help the majority of consumers who might have paid more.
In order to determine what consumers actually paid for their flights,
the best sources are large online travel agencies that actually sell
tickets, such as Expedia, Orbitz, and Travelocity. We airfare pundits
merely track and monitor published (not sold) fares using pretty much
the same two fare listing sources: ATPCO (the Airline Tariff Publishing
Company) and ITASoftware. Interestingly, despite the steady stream of
reported airfare price increase attempts and fare decreases over the
last year, Expedia, Inc., in its latest quarterly financial statement,
reports that revenue per air ticket sold decreased by 4% in Q4 2008
compared to Q4 2007. That statistic, based on ticket sales over a wide
range of routes and fare types, seems like a more reliable indicator
than anything we can think of.
"Sold vs. published does provide a better window into the real world,"
confirms airline industry consultant Bob Harrell of New York City-based
Harrell Associates. "It's just harder to get [the] data."
Another good source would be the airlines themselves, if you could get
them to divulge how many seats they sold at what prices on what routes
during various time periods. But good luck with that. As Singapore
Airlines spokesperson James Boyd explains, "When an airline launches a
sale, it's an attempt to grab market share. An airline would never
publicize how many seats were sold at what price on what routes,
because it would give competitors too much information."
Most Popular
- Recommended
- Commented



